mirror of
https://github.com/chiteroman/PlayIntegrityFix.git
synced 2025-04-29 01:22:07 +08:00
Update README.md
Do a better job of removing unnecessary stuff. (I mean seriously, I strive as best as I can for perfection, and I still make these errors anyway)
This commit is contained in:
parent
e6b5644a55
commit
3ee6fc1736
@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ And in SafetyNet you should get this:
|
||||
## A word on passing Strong Integrity
|
||||
While this module only returns passing verdicts for as far up as `MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY`, it is possible to achieve a passing verdict for `MEETS_STRONG_INTEGRITY` by using [5ec1cff's TrickyStore](https://github.com/5ec1cff/TrickyStore), to spoof a valid certificate chain (Often distributed as a file named `keybox.xml` and just called a _keybox_) to your device's [Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) module](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trusted_execution_environment).
|
||||
|
||||
_**However, it must be stressed that a keybox is hard to come by**_, given that they're leaked (Usually inadvertently) from OEMs and vendors. Even then, they are also often quite quickly revoked, due to a combination of people sending a deluge of server requests (Mostly for flexing their strong verdicts, which they probably didn't need anyway... You know who you are) and Google [deploying specialised crawlers](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/google-special-case-crawlers#google-safety) for detecting said keyboxes. You'll know you're using a revoked keybox when you're only passing `MEETS_BASIC_INTEGRITY`, at which point you'll need to find another to return to Strong Integrity, or use the publicly available AOSP keybox/just remove TrickyStore to return to Device Integrity
|
||||
_**However, it must be stressed that a keybox is hard to come by**_, given that they're leaked (Usually inadvertently) from OEMs and vendors. Even then, they are also often quite quickly revoked, due to a combination of people sending a deluge of server requests (Mostly for flexing their strong verdicts, which they probably didn't need anyway... You know who you are) and Google [deploying specialised crawlers](https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/google-special-case-crawlers#google-safety) for detecting said keyboxes. You'll know you're using a revoked keybox when you're only passing `MEETS_BASIC_INTEGRITY`, at which point you'll need to find another to return to Strong Integrity, or use the publicly available AOSP keybox/just remove TrickyStore to return to Device Integrity.
|
||||
|
||||
**TL;DR: Until May 2025, you are completely fine only passing up as far as `MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY`, and _unless it is absolutely necessary for your use case(s), you are better off not diving into this rabbit hole_**
|
||||
**TL;DR: Unless it is ABSOLUTELY VITAL for your use case(s), you are completely fine only passing up as far as `MEETS_DEVICE_INTEGRITY`, and not diving into this rabbit hole.**
|
||||
|
||||
## Acknowledgments
|
||||
- [kdrag0n](https://github.com/kdrag0n/safetynet-fix) & [Displax](https://github.com/Displax/safetynet-fix) for the original idea.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user